Washington, Aplts. v. Dept. of Pub. Welfare
Opinion
[J-62-2017] {MO: Todd, .1.]
IN THE'SUPREN[E COURT OF PEN`NSY.LVAN!A_
N[lDDL~E DISTR!CT
Bl|_-L|E VVASHINGTON, T|NA SMITH, : NO. 50 MAP 2016
OF’/-\l_ G|BSON, PENNSYL\//-\NIA . 7
MENTf-\L. HEALTH CON_SUMERS‘ : `Appea| from the.Order Of the ASSOC|ATION, MENTAL-HEALTH ,: Commonwea|th'Cc`)urt at' No. 602 MD ASSOCIATION lN PENNSYL\/AN|A, : 2012 dated March 281 2016 and MENTAL HEALT'H ASSOC|AT|ON OF : exited Mar-ch 29, 2016.
SOUTH EASTERN PENNSYLVAN!A, THE
PH|LADELPH|AALL\ANCE,DRUG /-\ND § ARGUED; Septembem:s,mw
AE_COHOL SER\{[CE PRO\/[DERS_ ORGAN|ZAT|ON OF PENNSYL\/AN|A, PENNSYLVAN|A COM[\/|UN'|TY PRO\/{DERS ASSOC|/-\T!ON, SUCCESS AG/-\|NST A|__l_ ODDS
THE DEPARTl\/IENT OF PUBL|C VVELFAR`E OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVAN|A
AF’PEAL OFZ BILLIE W/-\SHiNGTON,
TlNA SIVI|TH, OPAL G[BSON, PENNSYLVANIA l\/|ENTAL HEALTH CONSU|V|ERS' ASSOCl'AT|ON, M'ENTAL HEALTH ASSOC}ATION l|\| PENNSYLVANIA, NIENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIAT|ON OF SOUTHEASTER~N PENNSYLVANiA`, THE PHILADELPH[A /'-\LLIANCE, DRUG AND ALCOHOL . SERVlCE PROVEDERS ORGAN_|ZATf-ON _ : OF PENNSYL\/ANIA, SUCCESS
AGAINST ALL ODDS
CONQURR!NG_OPINION
JUSTICE MUNDY
DE.CIDED: duly 18, 2018
ijein the Weii~reasoned i\/iajority Opinion. However, | Write separately to distance myself from footnote 36. Because- the ’Majority determines that the provisions of H.B. 126.1,' P.N. 1385 Were entirely removed, it is unnecessary to the disposition of the case to engage in a germaneness anaiysis regarding the deleted subject matter and Act 80_.7 in light of this, l Wouid also refrain from examining the proposed un'ifyi'ng- subject for Aot 80 identified by' the Commonweaith Court.
Except forth'is point, | agree With the i\/iajority in ai| other respects
[J-62-20'17] [NiO; TOC|CI, J.] - 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Washington, Aplts. v. Dept. of Pub. Welfare (Washington, Aplts. v. Dept. of Pub. Welfare) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.