Washewich v. Lefave

219 So. 2d 46
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 19, 1969·No. No. 2145·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellant appeals from an order granting appellee a new trial. We have examined the record and the trial court’s order granting a new trial and vacating the directed verdict and judgment for the defendant and find the decision to be in accordance with law. Therefore we affirm. When a person is injured in two successive accidents, injuries sustained therefrom need not be apportioned. C. F. Hamblen, Inc. v. Owens, 1937, 127 Fla. 91, 172 So. 694; Manganelli v. Covington, Fla.App. 1959, 114 So.2d 320; Wise v. Carter, Fla. App.1960, 119 So.2d 40; Hollie v. Radcliffe, Fla.App.1967, 200 So.2d 616.

WALDEN, C. J., McCAIN, J., and TROWBRIDGE, C. PFEIFFER, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washewich v. Lefave, 219 So. 2d 46 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

219 So. 2d 46 (Washewich v. Lefave) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Salazar v. Santos (Harry) & Co., Inc.
537 So. 2d 1048 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Washewich v. LeFave
248 So. 2d 670 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)