Washewich v. Lefave

219 So. 2d 46
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 19, 1969
DocketNo. 2145
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 219 So. 2d 46 (Washewich v. Lefave) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washewich v. Lefave, 219 So. 2d 46 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellant appeals from an order granting appellee a new trial. We have examined the record and the trial court’s order granting a new trial and vacating the directed verdict and judgment for the defendant and find the decision to be in accordance with law. Therefore we affirm. When a person is injured in two successive accidents, injuries sustained therefrom need not be apportioned. C. F. Hamblen, Inc. v. Owens, 1937, 127 Fla. 91, 172 So. 694; Manganelli v. Covington, Fla.App. 1959, 114 So.2d 320; Wise v. Carter, Fla. App.1960, 119 So.2d 40; Hollie v. Radcliffe, Fla.App.1967, 200 So.2d 616.

WALDEN, C. J., McCAIN, J., and TROWBRIDGE, C. PFEIFFER, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Salazar v. Santos (Harry) & Co., Inc.
537 So. 2d 1048 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Washewich v. LeFave
248 So. 2d 670 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 So. 2d 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washewich-v-lefave-fladistctapp-1969.