Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Washburn v. State

Washburn v. State

805 So. 2d 1057, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 387, 2002 WL 83766
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 23, 2002
DocketNo. 1D01-1181
StatusPublished

This text of 805 So. 2d 1057 (Washburn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washburn v. State, 805 So. 2d 1057, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 387, 2002 WL 83766 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s motion, filed pursuant to rule 3.800(a), is facially insufficient to demonstrate entitlement to relief, and we therefore affirm the summary denial of this claim. See State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998); Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). However, this affirmance is without prejudice to the appellant’s right to refile a facially sufficient motion under rule 3.800, if he is able to do so. The present denial will not stand as a bar to a successive motion raising [1058]*1058these claims. See Tranquille v. State, 747 So.2d 426 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, BARFIELD, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baker v. State
714 So. 2d 1167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
State v. Mancino
714 So. 2d 429 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Tranquille v. State
747 So. 2d 426 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
805 So. 2d 1057, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 387, 2002 WL 83766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washburn-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.