Washburn v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Washburn v. State

88 So. 195, 17 Ala. App. 627, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 241

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 14, 1920

Docket6 Div. 712.

StatusPublished

This text of 88 So. 195 (Washburn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Washburn v. State, 88 So. 195, 17 Ala. App. 627, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 241 (Ala. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The defendant was indicted for the offense of seduction, was tried and convicted, and an indeterminate sentence of not less than four years nor more than five years was imposed upon him.

The appeal is upon the record proper, there being no bill of exceptions, and the time for filing same has expired. The record appears regular in all respects. There being no bill of exceptions, and the oral charge of the court not appearing, the written charges refused to defendant are not reviewable.

Let the judgment of the lower court stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The defendant was indicted for the offense of seduction, was tried and convicted, and an indeterminate sentence of not less than four years nor more than five years was imposed upon him.

The appeal is upon the record proper, there being no bill of exceptions, and the time for filing same has expired. The record appears regular in all respects. There being no bill of exceptions, and the oral charge of the court not appearing, the written charges refused to defendant are not reviewable.

Let the judgment of the lower court stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 So. 195, 17 Ala. App. 627, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washburn-v-state-alactapp-1920.