Washburn v. Overseers of the Poor of Hebron

9 Johns. 119
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1812·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There was no statute provision, authorizing the sessions to award costs in any case of bastardy, brought before them, under the act of 1801. (Laws, vol. 1. 194.) The provision in the act of 30th "March, 1810, c. 109. does not apply to cases of appeal, brought before the passing of the act, and unless the sessions are authorized specially by statute, to award costs, they have no authority to award them. The quarter sessions in England have no authority, to this day, to award costs in cases of this nature. (King v. Sweet, 9 East, 25.) In this case, then, none were to be awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washburn v. Overseers of the Poor of Hebron, 9 Johns. 119 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1812).

9 Johns. 119 (Washburn v. Overseers of the Poor of Hebron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fiero v. Betts
2 Barb. 633 (New York Supreme Court, 1848)