Washburn v. Mesquite Gaming

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided November 26, 2024·No. 2:24-cv-00383·Unknown

Opinion

4 Lonnie Washburn, Case No. 2:24-cv-00383-CDS-BNW 5 Plaintiff Order Closing Case 6 V. 7 Mesquite Gaming, LLC, [ECF No. 52] 8 Defendant 9 10 Plaintiff Lonnie Washburn and defendant Mesquite Gaming, LLC stipulate to dismiss this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). ECF No. 52. Once the 12] stipulation between the parties who have appeared is properly filed, no order of the court is 13] necessary to effectuate dismissal. Case law concerning stipulated dismissals under Rule 41 is 14] clear that the entry of such a stipulation of dismissal is effective automatically and does not 15 require judicial approval. Commercial Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 16 1999). Therefore, based on the parties’ stipulation [ECF No. 52], this case is dismissed with 17 prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and fees. The Clerk of Court is kindly instructed 18] to close this case. 19 Dated: November 26, 2024 /, / 20 or LZ _——— Cristina D. Silva 21 United tates District Judge 22 l

23 24 25 26

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washburn v. Mesquite Gaming, (D. Nev. 2024).

Washburn v. Mesquite Gaming (Washburn v. Mesquite Gaming) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.