Washburn v. Clarkson
This text of 123 Mass. 319 (Washburn v. Clarkson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The issue whether the trustee should be charged or discharged depended upon the question whether the assignment to the claimant was valid. The trustee had therefore a direct interest in that question and a right to be heard upon it, and was entitled to costs while attending for that purpose the court in which it was pending. There is nothing to show that the amount of costs allowed him was unreasonable. The case differs from one where no claimant intervenes, and the whole litigation after the filing of the trustee’s answer is between the plaintiff and defendant, in which the trustee has no occasion and no right to be heard. Gen. Sts. c. 142, §§ 60-62. Croxford v. Massachusetts Cotton Mills, 15 Gray, 70. Morrison v. McDermott, 6 Allen, 122. Wasson v. Bowman, 117 Mass. 91.
Taxation affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 Mass. 319, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washburn-v-clarkson-mass-1877.