Washburn Crosby Company v. Dan M. Lee, Individually and as Collector, Etc.

296 U.S. 641
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 11, 1935
Docket514
StatusPublished

This text of 296 U.S. 641 (Washburn Crosby Company v. Dan M. Lee, Individually and as Collector, Etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washburn Crosby Company v. Dan M. Lee, Individually and as Collector, Etc., 296 U.S. 641 (1935).

Opinion

296 U.S. 641

56 S.Ct. 174

80 L.Ed. 455

WASHBURN CROSBY COMPANY, petitioner,
v.
Dan M. LEE, Individually and as Collector, etc.*

No. 514.

Supreme Court of the United States

November 11, 1935

Mr. Charles B. Rugg, of Boston, Mass., for petitioner.

The Attorney General, for respondent.

No opinion filed in court below.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

*

Rehearing denied 296 U. S. 664, 56 S. Ct. 307, 80 L. Ed. 474.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Simon v. City Cab Co.
296 U.S. 640 (Supreme Court, 1935)
George Allison & Co. v. United States
296 U.S. 664 (Supreme Court, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
296 U.S. 641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washburn-crosby-company-v-dan-m-lee-individually-and-as-collector-etc-scotus-1935.