Wash v. First National Bank
27 S.E. 167, 99 Ga. 592
Opinion
This case is, in principle, controlled by the decision of this court in Horne v. Powell, 88 Ga. 631. The writer there undertook to state the true rule which should govern in such calles, and to give the reasons upon which that rule is founded. What was said in support of the decision then pronounced applies with equal force to the case at bar, the facts of which bring it squarely within the operation of the rule in question. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wash v. First National Bank, 27 S.E. 167, 99 Ga. 592 (Ga. 1896).
27 S.E. 167 (Wash v. First National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jackson v. Moultrie Production Credit Ass'n
47 S.E.2d 127 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Potts v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.
47 S.E.2d 178 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Haynes v. Armour Fertilizer Works
92 S.E. 648 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1917)
Collier v. Blake
85 S.E. 354 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Ford v. Fargason
48 S.E. 180 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)