Waseem Daker v. Scott Halperin, as Circuit Defender of Cobb County

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 1, 2023
DocketA24E0026
StatusPublished

This text of Waseem Daker v. Scott Halperin, as Circuit Defender of Cobb County (Waseem Daker v. Scott Halperin, as Circuit Defender of Cobb County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Waseem Daker v. Scott Halperin, as Circuit Defender of Cobb County, (Ga. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ November 01, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24E0026. WASEEM DAKER v. SCOTT HALPERIN, AS CIRCUIT DEFENDER OF COBB COUNTY.

Waseem Anas Daker, an inmate at Hayes State Prison, attempted to file a pro se petition for mandamus against Scott Halperin as Circuit Defender of Cobb County and requested to proceed in forma pauperis. On September 12, 2023, the trial court entered an order denying the filing of the petition pursuant to OCGA § 9-15-2 (d).1 On October 1, 2023, Daker filed an emergency motion requesting that this Court grant him an extension of time of 30 days to file an application for discretionary

1 OCGA § 9-15-2 (d) provides: When a civil action is presented for filing under this Code section by a party who is not represented by an attorney, the clerk of court shall not file the matter but shall present the complaint or other initial pleading to a judge of the court. The judge shall review the pleading and, if the judge determines that the pleading shows on its face such a complete absence of any justiciable issue of law or fact that it cannot be reasonably believed that the court could grant any relief against any party named in the pleading, then the judge shall enter an order denying filing of the pleading. If the judge does not so find, then the judge shall enter an order allowing filing and shall return the pleading to the clerk for filing as in other cases. An order denying filing shall be appealable in the same manner as an order dismissing an action.

1 appeal from the trial court’s order.2 The motion is hereby GRANTED. See Court of Appeals Rules 16 (c), 40 (b). Daker’s application for discretionary appeal shall be due on or before November 13, 2023.3

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 11/01/2023 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

2 While OCGA § 9-15-2 (d) states that “[a]n order denying filing shall be appealable in the same manner as an order dismissing an action,” Daker, as a prison inmate, is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996, OCGA § 42-12-1 et seq., and thus is required to file an application for discretionary appeal in accordance with OCGA § 5-6-35. See OCGA § 42-12-8; Jones v. Townsend, 267 Ga. 489, 490- 491 (480 SE2d 24) (1997). 3 Although a 30-day extension of time would fall on November 11, 2023, that date is a Saturday. See generally Court of Appeals Rule 3 (providing, in pertinent part, that “[w]hen a filing deadline falls on a Saturday, Sunday, an official state or national holiday, or a time when the Clerk’s office is closed for an emergency (such as inclement weather), the deadline is extended to the next business day”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Townsend
480 S.E.2d 24 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Waseem Daker v. Scott Halperin, as Circuit Defender of Cobb County, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waseem-daker-v-scott-halperin-as-circuit-defender-of-cobb-county-gactapp-2023.