Wasalaam v. Young

Fourth Circuit

Wasalaam v. Young

678 F. App'x 143

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 28, 2017·No. No. 16-7411·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sulyaman Alislam Wasalaam appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wasalaam v. Young, No. 1:16-cv-01068-WO-LPA, 2016 WL 5415766 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sulyaman Alislam Wasalaam appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wasalaam v. Young, No. 1:16-cv-01068-WO-LPA, 2016 WL 5415766 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Wasalaam v. Young, 678 F. App'x 143 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

678 F. App'x 143 (Wasalaam v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related