Warwick v. Matlack

7 N.J.L. 165
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 15, 1824·Published

Opinion

Kirkpatrick, O. J.

The proceedings are substantially .according to the true spirit and intention of the act. The law intended that a man should have his legal remedy upon "this statute, in the same way and to the same extent as if he had proceeded by summons or by a regular suit.

Ford, J.

By the principles of the common law, the whole penalty is due upon the non-payment of the interest, and for the amount of the penalty the judgment was always entered; .and, in order to be relieved, the debtor was obliged to resort to chancery; but now the practice was, to endorse upon the execution the sum or instalment actually due, and the levy was made for that amount only.

Eossell, J. concurred.

Motion to set aside the judgment refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warwick v. Matlack, 7 N.J.L. 165 (N.J. 1824).

7 N.J.L. 165 (Warwick v. Matlack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.