Warwick Sportswear Co. v. Simons

4 Misc. 2d 482, 13 N.Y.S.2d 321, 1939 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1430
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 24, 1939·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon its face the complaint States á Cause df action in favor of plaintiff corporation against the defendant for tho conversion by defendant of plaintiffs property, and the action should not be dismissed solely on the ground of the lack of any authority from the two-man board of directors (one of whom is the defendant, and the other the corporation’s president) to bring suit.

The judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Fbankenthaleb. and Noonan, JJ., concur; McCook, J., dissents.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warwick Sportswear Co. v. Simons, 4 Misc. 2d 482, 13 N.Y.S.2d 321, 1939 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1430 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

4 Misc. 2d 482 (Warwick Sportswear Co. v. Simons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sealand Investment Corp. v. Emprise Inc.
190 Cal. App. 2d 305 (California Court of Appeal, 1961)
Rothman & Schneider, Inc. v. Beckerman
141 N.E.2d 610 (New York Court of Appeals, 1957)
Gallaher v. Texagon Mills, Inc.
67 F. Supp. 845 (S.D. New York, 1946)