Warton's Estate

100 A. 653, 256 Pa. 201, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 586
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 8, 1917·No. Appeal, No. 97·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The petition of the son of the testatrix for an issue devisavit vel non ivas based upon alleged undue influence exerted over her in the execution of her will. It was not alleged that she did not have testamentary capacity, and, after all the competent evidence offered by the contestant had been received, there was nothing to show that [205]*205his mother had been influenced in any manner in disposing of her estate. Nothing can be profitably added to the opinion of the court below dismissing the son’s appeal from the probate of the tvill, and on that opinion his appeal to this court is dismissed, at his costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warton's Estate, 100 A. 653, 256 Pa. 201, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 586 (Pa. 1917).

100 A. 653 (Warton's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kesler v. Hugus
115 A. 875 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)