Warton Supplies, Inc. v. GEICO Indem. Co.

73 Misc. 3d 146(A), 2021 NY Slip Op 51256(U)
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 22, 2021
Docket2020-655 K C
StatusUnpublished

This text of 73 Misc. 3d 146(A) (Warton Supplies, Inc. v. GEICO Indem. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warton Supplies, Inc. v. GEICO Indem. Co., 73 Misc. 3d 146(A), 2021 NY Slip Op 51256(U) (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Warton Supplies, Inc. v GEICO Indem. Co. (2021 NY Slip Op 51256(U)) [*1]

Warton Supplies, Inc. v GEICO Indem. Co.
2021 NY Slip Op 51256(U) [73 Misc 3d 146(A)]
Decided on December 22, 2021
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on December 22, 2021
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT: : THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, P.J., WAVNY TOUSSAINT, DONNA-MARIE E. GOLIA, JJ
2020-655 K C

Warton Supplies, Inc., as Assignee of Alana Rose, Appellant,

against

GEICO Indemnity Company, Respondent.


Kopelevich & Feldsherova, P.C. (David Landfair of counsel), for appellant. Rivkin Radler, LLP (Stuart M. Bodoff of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Lorna J. McAllister, J.), dated October 11, 2019. The order, insofar as appealed from, upon reargument, adhered to that court's prior determination in an order entered March 20, 2019 granting defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order dated October 11, 2019, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground, as relevant here, that plaintiff had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath. By order entered March 20, 2019, the Civil Court granted defendant's motion dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff thereafter moved to reargue its opposition to defendant's summary judgment motion. Plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court dated October 11, 2019 as, upon reargument, adhered to the court's prior determination in the March 20, 2019 order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

For the reasons stated in Warton Supplies, Inc., as Assignee of Jean Louis v GEICO (Gov Employees) (— Misc 3d &mdash, 2021 NY Slip Op — [appeal No. 2019-859 K C], decided herewith), the order dated October 11, 2019, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed.

ALIOTTA, P.J., TOUSSAINT and GOLIA, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: December 22, 2021

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Warton Supplies, Inc. v. GEICO (Gov Empls.)
73 Misc. 3d 146(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 Misc. 3d 146(A), 2021 NY Slip Op 51256(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warton-supplies-inc-v-geico-indem-co-nyappterm-2021.