Warton Supplies, Inc. v. GEICO Indem. Co.
This text of 73 Misc. 3d 146(A) (Warton Supplies, Inc. v. GEICO Indem. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Warton Supplies, Inc. v GEICO Indem. Co. (2021 NY Slip Op 51256(U)) [*1]
| Warton Supplies, Inc. v GEICO Indem. Co. |
| 2021 NY Slip Op 51256(U) [73 Misc 3d 146(A)] |
| Decided on December 22, 2021 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Decided on December 22, 2021
PRESENT: : THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, P.J., WAVNY TOUSSAINT, DONNA-MARIE E. GOLIA, JJ
2020-655 K C
against
GEICO Indemnity Company, Respondent.
Kopelevich & Feldsherova, P.C. (David Landfair of counsel), for appellant. Rivkin Radler, LLP (Stuart M. Bodoff of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Lorna J. McAllister, J.), dated October 11, 2019. The order, insofar as appealed from, upon reargument, adhered to that court's prior determination in an order entered March 20, 2019 granting defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order dated October 11, 2019, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with $25 costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground, as relevant here, that plaintiff had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath. By order entered March 20, 2019, the Civil Court granted defendant's motion dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff thereafter moved to reargue its opposition to defendant's summary judgment motion. Plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court dated October 11, 2019 as, upon reargument, adhered to the court's prior determination in the March 20, 2019 order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
For the reasons stated in Warton Supplies, Inc., as Assignee of Jean Louis v GEICO (Gov Employees) (— Misc 3d &mdash, 2021 NY Slip Op — [appeal No. 2019-859 K C], decided herewith), the order dated October 11, 2019, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed.
ALIOTTA, P.J., TOUSSAINT and GOLIA, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: December 22, 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 Misc. 3d 146(A), 2021 NY Slip Op 51256(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warton-supplies-inc-v-geico-indem-co-nyappterm-2021.