Warthen v. International Dynetics Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Warthen v. International Dynetics Corp.

100 A.D.2d 801, 474 N.Y.S.2d 954, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17903

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 17, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 100 A.D.2d 801 (Warthen v. International Dynetics Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Warthen v. International Dynetics Corp., 100 A.D.2d 801, 474 N.Y.S.2d 954, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, (Seymour Schwartz, J.), entered on March 8,1983, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of reversing the judgment in favor of plaintiff and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, unless the plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon his attorney of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in his favor to $1,250,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, [802]*802without costs and without disbursements. 1 After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Asch, Bloom and Milonas, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, (Seymour Schwartz, J.), entered on March 8,1983, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of reversing the judgment in favor of plaintiff and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, unless the plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon his attorney of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in his favor to $1,250,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, [802]*802without costs and without disbursements. 1 After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Asch, Bloom and Milonas, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 A.D.2d 801, 474 N.Y.S.2d 954, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warthen-v-international-dynetics-corp-nyappdiv-1984.