Wartenbach v. State
160 S.W.2d 72
This text of 160 S.W.2d 72 (Wartenbach v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wartenbach v. State, 160 S.W.2d 72 (Tex. 1942).
Opinion
Conviction is for bigamy, punishment assessed being confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years.
The indictment appears to sufficiently charge the offense. The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. In such, condition nothing is presented for review.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
160 S.W.2d 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wartenbach-v-state-texcrimapp-1942.