Warshawsky v. Dry Dock, East Broadway & Battery Railroad

86 N.Y.S. 748
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedFebruary 23, 1904
StatusPublished

This text of 86 N.Y.S. 748 (Warshawsky v. Dry Dock, East Broadway & Battery Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warshawsky v. Dry Dock, East Broadway & Battery Railroad, 86 N.Y.S. 748 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Opinion

FREEDMAN, P. J.

Assuming that the case as made upon the trial was one for the jury, the judgment cannot be sustained, because the-damages were inadequately proved. The son of one of the plaintiffs, who was called to testify as to the repairs done to the wagon, was not qualified as to the reasonable value of the necessary repairs, and his testimony as to the cost alone was insufficient. Volkmar v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 28 Misc. Rep. 141, 58 N. Y. Supp. 1021. Moreover, it was not shown that the horse for the value of which a recovery was had died as a result of the accident.

The judgment and order should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Volkmar v. Third Avenue Railroad
28 Misc. 141 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 N.Y.S. 748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warshawsky-v-dry-dock-east-broadway-battery-railroad-nyappterm-1904.