Warsawer v. Hotchkiss

New York Supreme Court

Warsawer v. Hotchkiss

27 N.Y.S. 491, 83 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 609, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 869

DecidedFebruary 12, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 27 N.Y.S. 491 (Warsawer v. Hotchkiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Warsawer v. Hotchkiss, 27 N.Y.S. 491, 83 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 609, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 869 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

DYKMAN, J.

This is an appeal from so much of an order made at the special term as relates to the name of the agent of the de[493]*493fendants who gave to the assignee of the plaintiff the false and fraudulent information alleged in the third paragraph of the complaint. We think the proper disposition of the case was made at the special term, and that the order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DYKMAN, J.

This is an appeal from so much of an order made at the special term as relates to the name of the agent of the de[493]*493fendants who gave to the assignee of the plaintiff the false and fraudulent information alleged in the third paragraph of the complaint. We think the proper disposition of the case was made at the special term, and that the order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 N.Y.S. 491, 83 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 609, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warsawer-v-hotchkiss-nysupct-1894.