Warriors v. National Labor Relations Board

D.C. Circuit

Warriors v. National Labor Relations Board

50 F. App'x 3

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided November 15, 2002·No. No. 01-1394·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This cause was considered on the record compiled before the National Labor Relations Board and was argued by counsel. It is

[4] ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review is denied, and the order of the National Labor Relations Board is enforced. The Board’s factual findings are supported by substantial evidence; its conclusions of law are not in error, and its distinction of Sterling Processing Corp., 291 NLRB 208 (1988), is reasonable.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This cause was considered on the record compiled before the National Labor Relations Board and was argued by counsel. It is

[4] ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review is denied, and the order of the National Labor Relations Board is enforced. The Board’s factual findings are supported by substantial evidence; its conclusions of law are not in error, and its distinction of Sterling Processing Corp., 291 NLRB 208 (1988), is reasonable.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Warriors v. National Labor Relations Board, 50 F. App'x 3 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Pincite

50 F. App'x 3 (Warriors v. National Labor Relations Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.