Warriner v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.

173 A.D. 960, 158 N.Y.S. 1134

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from should be modified by granting the motion to the extent of requiring the plaintiff to state separately the cause of action upon each bond sued upon in the first cause of action as stated in the complaint, and also to state separately the causes of action upon the guaranties specified in the second cause of action as stated in the complaint; and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Present— Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Smith and Page, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warriner v. Hocking Valley Railway Co., 173 A.D. 960, 158 N.Y.S. 1134 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

173 A.D. 960 (Warriner v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.