Warriner v. Casa Loma Land Corp.

324 So. 2d 675, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 19084
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 18, 1975·No. No. 74-551·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of the trial court sets forth its finding as follows:

******

“ . . . the identical claims and legal theories had been previously adjudicated by the Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida and by the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals as evidenced by a brief filed by the Plaintiff as Appellant in the United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, Case No. 72-1550, which affirmatively and on its face demonstrates that there is nothing in the Amended Complaint which was not or could not have been raised, argued or urged by the Plaintiff in the previous litigation; and because there must be an end to the litigation (See Butler v. Bertram & Co., 281 So.2d 227 (3rd D.C.A.1973)) . . .”

******

The record supports the finding. It is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warriner v. Casa Loma Land Corp., 324 So. 2d 675, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 19084 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

324 So. 2d 675 (Warriner v. Casa Loma Land Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Butler v. Richard Bertram & Company
281 So. 2d 227 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)