Warriner v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago
This text of 313 So. 2d 81 (Warriner v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff-appellant seeks review of the trial court’s order dismissing her complaint against all defendants, save two, on the grounds of res judicata and further dismissing the complaint against the remaining two defendants for failure to state a cause of action against them.
It affirmatively appearing after a review of the record on appeal that plaintiff-appellant already has litigated unsuccessfully the subject matter of the instant law suit in the state trial and appeals courts1 and in addition in the federal trial and appeals courts,2 we conclude that the trial judge was correct in dismissing appellant’s complaint on the grounds of res judicata. Cf. Cohen v. Cohen, Fla. 1954, 70 So.2d 362. Further, we find no error in the dismissal thereof as to the two remaining defendants for failure to state a cause of action.
Accordingly, the herein appealed order is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
313 So. 2d 81, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warriner-v-american-national-bank-trust-co-of-chicago-fladistctapp-1975.