Warriner v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago

313 So. 2d 81, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14876
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 15, 1975·No. No. 74-308·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-appellant seeks review of the trial court’s order dismissing her complaint against all defendants, save two, on the grounds of res judicata and further dismissing the complaint against the remaining two defendants for failure to state a cause of action against them.

It affirmatively appearing after a review of the record on appeal that plaintiff-appellant already has litigated unsuccessfully the subject matter of the instant law suit in the state trial and appeals courts1 and in addition in the federal trial and appeals courts,2 we conclude that the trial judge was correct in dismissing appellant’s complaint on the grounds of res judicata. Cf. Cohen v. Cohen, Fla. 1954, 70 So.2d 362. Further, we find no error in the dismissal thereof as to the two remaining defendants for failure to state a cause of action.

Accordingly, the herein appealed order is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warriner v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago, 313 So. 2d 81, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14876 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

313 So. 2d 81 (Warriner v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frank v. Campbell Property Management, Inc.
351 So. 2d 364 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)