Warriner Smith Utilities, Inc. v. Friedman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Warriner Smith Utilities, Inc. v. Friedman

245 A.D. 756

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 245 A.D. 756 (Warriner Smith Utilities, Inc. v. Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Warriner Smith Utilities, Inc. v. Friedman, 245 A.D. 756 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Action for materials furnished and labor performed. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. The plaintiff established a prima facie case against the respondent. Further, we are of opinion that the trial court erred in excluding the contract for the installation of the gas outfit, which contract bears the signature of the respondent. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for materials furnished and labor performed. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. The plaintiff established a prima facie case against the respondent. Further, we are of opinion that the trial court erred in excluding the contract for the installation of the gas outfit, which contract bears the signature of the respondent. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 A.D. 756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warriner-smith-utilities-inc-v-friedman-nyappdiv-1935.