Warriner Smith Utilities, Inc. v. Friedman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Warriner Smith Utilities, Inc. v. Friedman

245 A.D. 756

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Action for materials furnished and labor performed. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. The plaintiff established a prima facie case against the respondent. Further, we are of opinion that the trial court erred in excluding the contract for the installation of the gas outfit, which contract bears the signature of the respondent. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for materials furnished and labor performed. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. The plaintiff established a prima facie case against the respondent. Further, we are of opinion that the trial court erred in excluding the contract for the installation of the gas outfit, which contract bears the signature of the respondent. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Warriner Smith Utilities, Inc. v. Friedman, 245 A.D. 756 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

245 A.D. 756 (Warriner Smith Utilities, Inc. v. Friedman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.