Warrick v. State

268 S.W. 1118, 99 Tex. Crim. 68, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 49
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 28, 1925·No. No. 9200.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the unlawful possession of equipment for the manufacture of intoxicating liquors; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

We find no recognizance in the record although there is a statement to the effect that such recognizance was taken.

In the absence of a recognizance or an appeal bond approved in the manner required by law, this court is without jurisdiction to pass on the merits of the case.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warrick v. State, 268 S.W. 1118, 99 Tex. Crim. 68, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 49 (Tex. 1925).

268 S.W. 1118 (Warrick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. State
105 S.W.2d 242 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Kogar v. State
10 S.W.2d 546 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)