Warren v. Winfrey

94 S.E.2d 481, 244 N.C. 521, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 452
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 26, 1956
Docket171
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 94 S.E.2d 481 (Warren v. Winfrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warren v. Winfrey, 94 S.E.2d 481, 244 N.C. 521, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 452 (N.C. 1956).

Opinion

*522 Per Curiam.

“The power of the court to grant an involuntary non-suit is altogether statutory and must be exercised in accord with the statute, G.S. 1-183.” Ward v. Cruse, 234 N.C. 388, 67 S.E. 2d 257.

G.S. 1-183 provides that “when on trial of an issue of fact in a civil action . . ., the plaintiff has introduced his evidence and rested his case, the defendant may move ... for judgment as in case of nonsuit.”

The court had no power to nonsuit the case before plaintiff rested his case. For this error plaintiff is entitled to a new trial. In the state of the record the questions discussed in the briefs are not presented for decision.

Reversed.

Johnson, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jenkins v. Hawthorne
153 S.E.2d 339 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)
Biggs Ex Rel. Biggs v. Biggs Ex Rel. Weiters
116 S.E.2d 178 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.E.2d 481, 244 N.C. 521, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-winfrey-nc-1956.