Warren v. Waldron
This text of 108 Mass. 232 (Warren v. Waldron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The action having been referred by rule of court, the referee had exclusive jurisdiction of the question of costs. Nelson v. Andrews, 2 Mass. 164. Moore v. Heald, 7 Mass. 467. Loud v. Hobart, 2 Cush. 325. Jones v. Carter, 8 Allen, 431. Gen. Sts. c. 156, § 21. The judgment should have followed the award. The court had allowed the tenant to amend upon payment of a double term fee, but had not required the further condition of taking no costs prior to that time. Consequently the tenant, upon the acceptance of the award, was entitled to tax his costs prior to the amendment, and the clerk taxed them rightly, and the court afterwards erred in apportioning them.
Taxation of costs by the clerk affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
108 Mass. 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-waldron-mass-1871.