Warren v. Walbridge

61 Ill. 173
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1871
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 61 Ill. 173 (Warren v. Walbridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warren v. Walbridge, 61 Ill. 173 (Ill. 1871).

Opinion

Per Curiam :

This was a bill in chancery, filed by the appellees against the appellants, to set aside a contract for the sale of the same patent right, as in the case of Warren et al. v. Doolittle, ante, for the counties of Milwaukee and Sauk, in the State of Wisconsin.

The two cases are essentially alike in their main features, except that, in the present case, there is proof that, for several years after the making of the contract, it was acted upon by the purchaser of the patent right and*his representatives, with a knowledge of all the facts, and treated as still subsisting, which affords an additional reason why a court of equity should not interfere. 1 Story Eq. Ju. sec. 203 a; Ormes v. Beadel, 2 De Gex, F. & J. 236; Vigars v. Pike, 8 Clark & Finn, 562.

The opinion in that case governs the decision of this.

The decree of the court below is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings in conformity with this opinion, and that in Warren et al. v. Doolittle.

Decree reversed.,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bogue v. Franks
100 Ill. App. 434 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1902)
Higgins v. Lansingh
40 N.E. 362 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 Ill. 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-walbridge-ill-1871.