Warren v. Walbridge
This text of 61 Ill. 173 (Warren v. Walbridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was a bill in chancery, filed by the appellees against the appellants, to set aside a contract for the sale of the same patent right, as in the case of Warren et al. v. Doolittle, ante, for the counties of Milwaukee and Sauk, in the State of Wisconsin.
The two cases are essentially alike in their main features, except that, in the present case, there is proof that, for several years after the making of the contract, it was acted upon by the purchaser of the patent right and*his representatives, with a knowledge of all the facts, and treated as still subsisting, which affords an additional reason why a court of equity should not interfere. 1 Story Eq. Ju. sec. 203 a; Ormes v. Beadel, 2 De Gex, F. & J. 236; Vigars v. Pike, 8 Clark & Finn, 562.
The opinion in that case governs the decision of this.
The decree of the court below is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings in conformity with this opinion, and that in Warren et al. v. Doolittle.
Decree reversed.,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 Ill. 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-walbridge-ill-1871.