Warren v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Warren v. United States

70 F.2d 105, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4073

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 3, 1934

DocketNo. 3570

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 70 F.2d 105 (Warren v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Warren v. United States, 70 F.2d 105, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4073 (4th Cir. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants were indicted for transporting and possessing intoxicating liquors in violation of the National Prohibition Aet, and, from sentences imposed upon conviction, appealed to this court. The ease was pending on appeal at the time of the ratification of the Twenty-First Amendment to the [106]*106Constitution; and, under the recent decision of the Supreme Court in United States v. Chambers and Gibson, 54 S. Ct. 434, 78 L. Ed. -, 89 A. L. R. 1510, the judgment of the court below must be reversed, and the ease remanded, with direction to dismiss.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants were indicted for transporting and possessing intoxicating liquors in violation of the National Prohibition Aet, and, from sentences imposed upon conviction, appealed to this court. The ease was pending on appeal at the time of the ratification of the Twenty-First Amendment to the [106]*106Constitution; and, under the recent decision of the Supreme Court in United States v. Chambers and Gibson, 54 S. Ct. 434, 78 L. Ed. -, 89 A. L. R. 1510, the judgment of the court below must be reversed, and the ease remanded, with direction to dismiss.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 F.2d 105, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-united-states-ca4-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack