Warren v. The City of Henderson Nevada

Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 5 ALLANNA WARREN, Case No.: 2:23-cv-1503-GMN-NJK 6 Plaintiff, ORDER Vv. 7 THE CITY OF HENDERSON NEVADA, et [Docket Nos. 39, 40] 8] al., 9 Defendants. 10 Pending before the Court are Plaintiff's motion to issue subpoena and motion to issue 11 summons.! Docket Nos. 39, 40. Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis. Docket No. 30. On 12|| February 23, 2024, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's complaint with leave to amend. Docket No. 35 at 3. Plaintiff has not yet filed an amended complaint for screening and, therefore, these motions are premature. 15 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motions are DENIED without prejudice.” Docket Nos. 39, 40. 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 Dated: March 5, 2024 18 J fo ne Nancy.J. Sop Ne 19 United States Magistrate Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 __——C ' The Court construes pro se filings liberally. Blaisdell v. Frappiea, 729 F.3d 1237, 1241 27} (9th Cir. 2013). 28 The Court expresses no opinion as to the merits of the instant motions.