Warren v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Warren v. State

365 S.W.3d 654, 2012 WL 1623985, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 638

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 9, 2012

DocketWD 73629

StatusPublished

This text of 365 S.W.3d 654 (Warren v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Warren v. State, 365 S.W.3d 654, 2012 WL 1623985, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 638 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Phillip Warren appeals the circuit court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief, following an eviden-tiary hearing. After a jury trial, Warren was convicted. in Boone County Circuit Court of sale of a controlled substance near a school, Section 195.214 (RSMo 2000).

Because the findings and the conclusions of the motion court, which denied Warren’s post-conviction relief motion, are not erroneous, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Phillip Warren appeals the circuit court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief, following an eviden-tiary hearing. After a jury trial, Warren was convicted. in Boone County Circuit Court of sale of a controlled substance near a school, Section 195.214 (RSMo 2000).

Because the findings and the conclusions of the motion court, which denied Warren’s post-conviction relief motion, are not erroneous, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

365 S.W.3d 654, 2012 WL 1623985, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-state-moctapp-2012.