Warren v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Warren v. State

353 S.W.3d 473, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1620, 2011 WL 6029807

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 6, 2011

DocketWD 73143

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 353 S.W.3d 473 (Warren v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Warren v. State, 353 S.W.3d 473, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1620, 2011 WL 6029807 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Joaquin Warren appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Joaquin Warren appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

353 S.W.3d 473, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1620, 2011 WL 6029807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-state-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack