Warren v. State
353 S.W.3d 473, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1620, 2011 WL 6029807
Opinion
ORDER
Joaquin Warren appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Warren v. State, 353 S.W.3d 473, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1620, 2011 WL 6029807 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
353 S.W.3d 473 (Warren v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moorman v. TREASURER OF STATE-CUSTODIAN
353 S.W.3d 473 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)