Warren v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Warren v. State

823 S.W.2d 164, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 226, 1992 WL 25368

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 18, 1992·No. No. 60310·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Warren v. State, 823 S.W.2d 164, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 226, 1992 WL 25368 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

823 S.W.2d 164 (Warren v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.