Warren v. State

558 S.E.2d 741, 253 Ga. App. 146, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 125, 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 2
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 4, 2002
DocketA02A0143
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 558 S.E.2d 741 (Warren v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warren v. State, 558 S.E.2d 741, 253 Ga. App. 146, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 125, 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 2 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Phipps, Judge.

Mack Warren was charged with and convicted of four counts of aggravated assault after he shot his stepdaughter, Kizzy Taylor, and his niece, Latisha Taylor, with a handgun and attempted to shoot his wife, Ruthie Warren Taylor, and niece, April Taylor. He appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction and the court’s charge on aggravated assault. We affirm, because we find that the evidence was sufficient and the charge was proper.

Warren claimed that he was acting in self-defense. His defense found support in April Taylor’s testimony. The other women testified, however, that Warren’s assaults were unprovoked.

Warren’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is wholly without merit. Resolution of conflicts in the testimony of the witnesses, including State’s witnesses, was for the jury.1 Construed in a [147]*147light most favorable to support the verdict, the evidence was sufficient to authorize any rational trier of fact to find Warren guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.2

Decided January 4, 2002. Hugh O. Morris, Jr., for appellant. Kenneth B. Hodges III, District Attorney, Jennifer A. Green, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Warren charges the trial court with error in instructing the jury on aggravated assault under subsection (a) (1) of OCGA § 16-5-21 (“specific intent” aggravated assault). This complaint is also completely lacking in merit, as the transcript shows that the trial court charged the jury under subsection (a) (2) (“deadly weapon” aggravated assault) only.

Judgment affirmed.

Andrews, P. J., and Mikell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eason v. State
582 S.E.2d 194 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
558 S.E.2d 741, 253 Ga. App. 146, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 125, 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-state-gactapp-2002.