Warren v. State
This text of 117 S.E. 677 (Warren v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was charged with the offense of rape and convicted of assault with intent to rape. The jury are the arbiters of the facts. If' the jury believed the testimony offered by the State, which they did, the verdict in this case was demanded.
When the charge of the court is read in its entirety, it is not subject to the criticisms urged to the excerpts complained of.
The trial judge having approved the verdict, which was rendered upon conflicting evidence, and there being no assignments of error which indicate that the defendant has not had a legal trial, it was proper for the court to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
117 S.E. 677, 30 Ga. App. 286, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-state-gactapp-1923.