Warren v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Warren v. State

78 S.E. 202, 12 Ga. App. 695, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 714

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 16, 1913

Docket4722

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 78 S.E. 202 (Warren v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Warren v. State, 78 S.E. 202, 12 Ga. App. 695, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 714 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. On the trial of an accusation of the offense of larceny from the house the jury may find the1 accused not guilty of the offense charged in the accusation,- but, if the evidence warrants it, guilty of an attempt to commit that offense, though the accusation contain no special count charging such an attempt. Penal Code (1910), § 1061.

2. On the trial of an accusation of larceny from the house, the jury found the following verdict: “We, the jury, find the defendant not “guilty as charged in the bill of indictment, but guilty of an attempt to commit larceny.” Held: Verdicts must not be avoided unless from necessity; and, giving to this verdict a reasonable construction, the jury intended to find the accused guilty of an attempt to commit the crime charged in the accusation, to wit, larceny from the house, and not an attempt to commit simple larceny. Civil Code (1910), § 5927.

3. Where the accusation describes the property as being fifty cigars of the value of two dollars, and the proof shows that the stolen property consisted of a box of cigars of the value of one dollar and ninety cents, the variance is immaterial, whether the box contained fifty cigars or a less number.

-4. The evidence is exceedingly weak and unsatisfactory as to the existence of any criminal intent, but this court can not say that there were no circumstances from which the jury could have inferred the existence of such intent; and, as no error of law was .committed, the verdict must stand. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, C. J.

1. On the trial of an accusation of the offense of larceny from the house the jury may find the1 accused not guilty of the offense charged in the accusation,- but, if the evidence warrants it, guilty of an attempt to commit that offense, though the accusation contain no special count charging such an attempt. Penal Code (1910), § 1061.

2. On the trial of an accusation of larceny from the house, the jury found the following verdict: “We, the jury, find the defendant not “guilty as charged in the bill of indictment, but guilty of an attempt to commit larceny.” Held: Verdicts must not be avoided unless from necessity; and, giving to this verdict a reasonable construction, the jury intended to find the accused guilty of an attempt to commit the crime charged in the accusation, to wit, larceny from the house, and not an attempt to commit simple larceny. Civil Code (1910), § 5927.

3. Where the accusation describes the property as being fifty cigars of the value of two dollars, and the proof shows that the stolen property consisted of a box of cigars of the value of one dollar and ninety cents, the variance is immaterial, whether the box contained fifty cigars or a less number.

-4. The evidence is exceedingly weak and unsatisfactory as to the existence of any criminal intent, but this court can not say that there were no circumstances from which the jury could have inferred the existence of such intent; and, as no error of law was .committed, the verdict must stand. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 S.E. 202, 12 Ga. App. 695, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-state-gactapp-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack