Warren v. State

23 So. 3d 218, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19332, 2009 WL 4591073
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 8, 2009·No. 1D08-4566·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. The issue of the appropriate amount of restitution was not properly preserved for appellate review, and no fundamental error is presented. Mapp v. State, 18 So.3d 33 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).

KAHN, BENTON, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warren v. State, 23 So. 3d 218, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19332, 2009 WL 4591073 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

23 So. 3d 218 (Warren v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rivera v. State
34 So. 3d 207 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)