Warren v. State

565 So. 2d 908, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6431, 1990 WL 121773
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Warren v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 547 So. 2d 324
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 24, 1990·No. No. 88-00108·Published

Opinion

FRANK, Judge.

The appellant has presented two issues for our review. The states concedes that the second issue is meritorious, and we agree. The appellant was convicted of both delivery and possession of the same heroin, offenses predating the amendment of section 775.021(4), Florida Statutes (Supp.1988). Thus, under the state of law at that time, the convictions violated the double jeopardy provisions of the United States and Florida constitutions. State v. Smith, 547 So.2d 613 (Fla.1989).

We vacate the possession conviction and sentence. Williams v. State, 558 So.2d 1103 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). In all other aspects this matter is affirmed.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warren v. State, 565 So. 2d 908, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6431, 1990 WL 121773 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

565 So. 2d 908 (Warren v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Smith
547 So. 2d 613 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Williams v. State
558 So. 2d 1103 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)