Warren v. State
421 So. 2d 808, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28182
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 16, 1982·No. No. 82-504·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The State concedes that it was error for the trial court to deny the defendant an opportunity to present lay testimony on the issue of his sanity at the time of the alleged violation of probation. Butler v. State, 261 So.2d 508 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972). The State’s argument that a proffer of the testimony is required is without merit. Brown v. State, 362 So.2d 437 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Warren v. State, 421 So. 2d 808, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28182 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
421 So. 2d 808 (Warren v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Medrano v. State
892 So. 2d 508 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)