Warren v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Warren v. State

421 So. 2d 808, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28182

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 16, 1982

DocketNo. 82-504

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 421 So. 2d 808 (Warren v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Warren v. State, 421 So. 2d 808, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28182 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State concedes that it was error for the trial court to deny the defendant an opportunity to present lay testimony on the issue of his sanity at the time of the alleged violation of probation. Butler v. State, 261 So.2d 508 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972). The State’s argument that a proffer of the testimony is required is without merit. Brown v. State, 362 So.2d 437 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The State concedes that it was error for the trial court to deny the defendant an opportunity to present lay testimony on the issue of his sanity at the time of the alleged violation of probation. Butler v. State, 261 So.2d 508 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972). The State’s argument that a proffer of the testimony is required is without merit. Brown v. State, 362 So.2d 437 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

421 So. 2d 808, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack