Warren v. Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers, LLP
This text of 466 F. App'x 284 (Warren v. Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers, LLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert Warren and Jacquelin Warren appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Warren v. Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers, LLP, No. 7:10-cv-00071-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 19, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
466 F. App'x 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-smith-debnam-narron-drake-saintsing-myers-llp-ca4-2012.