Warren v. Maryland

472 F. App'x 265
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 1, 2012
DocketNo. 12-6356
StatusPublished

This text of 472 F. App'x 265 (Warren v. Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warren v. Maryland, 472 F. App'x 265 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James A. Warren appeals the district court’s order granting in part, and denying in part, the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We dismiss Warren’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Warren seeks to appeal is not a final order, nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
472 F. App'x 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-maryland-ca4-2012.