Warren v. Littleton Orange Crush Bottling Co.

207 N.C. 313
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 31, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 207 N.C. 313 (Warren v. Littleton Orange Crush Bottling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warren v. Littleton Orange Crush Bottling Co., 207 N.C. 313 (N.C. 1934).

Opinion

Pee CukiaM.

In Wilson v. Charlotte, 206 N. C., 856, it was said: “Tbe only assignment of error in tbe case at bar is tbe ‘signing of tbe judgment, . . . having duly excepted to tbe signing of said judgment.’ If said assignment merely refers to tbe act of signing tbe judgment, it presents no question of law for review. But, upon tbe other band, if it be treated cas an exception to tbe judgment, it presents tbe single question whether tbe facts found or admitted are sufficient to support tbe judgment.’ ”

So, in tbe present case there is no exception to tbe finding of fact that tbe claim was not usurious, and consequently tbe judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. City of Charlotte
175 S.E. 306 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
207 N.C. 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-littleton-orange-crush-bottling-co-nc-1934.