Warren v. Kornegay
This text of 20 N.M. 225 (Warren v. Kornegay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OP THE COURT.
— Counsel for appellant raises but one point, namely, that the judgment of the lower court is not sustained by a preponderance of the evidence. The trial judge heard the cause upon depositions and testimony-taken 'by an examiner. Following the practice as announced in Gallup Electric Light Co. v. Pacific Improvement Co., 16 N. M. 86, 113 Pac. 848, we have reviewed the entire record as if trying the case in the first instance, and upon such review our conclusions differ in no wise from those of the trial court. - -
Judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 N.M. 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-kornegay-nm-1915.