Warren v. Kohr

64 S.W. 62, 26 Tex. Civ. App. 331, 1901 Tex. App. LEXIS 111
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 22, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 64 S.W. 62 (Warren v. Kohr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warren v. Kohr, 64 S.W. 62, 26 Tex. Civ. App. 331, 1901 Tex. App. LEXIS 111 (Tex. Ct. App. 1901).

Opinion

FLY, Associate Justice.

Appellants instituted this suit to restrain the sale of certain property under an execution issued out of the Justice Court in a case styled R C. Harn v. Green Warren, on the ground that it was a part of their homestead. A temporary writ of injunction was-granted. R. C. Harn, one of the appellees, answered, setting up his-judgment in the Justice Court and the issue of execution thereunder, the filing and registration of an abstract of the judgment, the issue of the alias execution under which the property was seized, and alleged that if the property’was ever a part of the homestead, it had been severed from and abandoned as a part of the same. Joseph Kohr, the constable who levied the writ of execution, answered by general denial.

*332 The cause was tried without a jury, and judgment rendered that the portion of the property rented to Kothman & Co. was subject to execution, and that the portion on which the saloon is erected was a part of the homestead, as well as the yard back of it, and as to that portion the injunction was perpetuated. There was also judgment as prayed in the answer for the amount of Warren’s indebtedness to Harn, for foreclosure of the judgment lien obtained by the abstract of the judgment of the Justice Court, and a decree for an order of sale to be issued out of the District Court. It was provided in the judgment that paying it would satisfy the judgment in the Justice Court. The finding of facts of the District Court are as follows, with the exception of the omission of the lease to Kothman & Co., only parts of which it is deemed necessary to copy into this opinion:

“Green Warren and Susan E. Warren, the plaintiffs, being husband and wife, on April 29, 1879, acquired title to all of lot Ho. 4, in San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas, containing 6 3-100 acres, said lot being now known as city block Ho. 882, and so described by the parties in their pleadings. Said block fronts on San Marcos street and the right of way of the Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railroad Company, and is otherwise bounded by the San Pedro Creek and a creek known as the Cahrquinto de las Apaches, or Weesatch Creek — reference being made to the plat attached to the lease hereinafter named. Green Warren and wife had their family residence upon that part of said block which is designated “residence of G. Warren” upon said plat, but used the entire block for the purposes of a home and business until about five years ago, as hereinafter stated.
“More than five years ago plaintiff, Green Warren, built a saloon upon the following described portion of said property fronting on San Marcos street, that is to say: having a front of about 35 feet on San Marcos street, and running thence back about 40 feet to a fence, bounded west by San Marcos street, south by a certain fence constituting the fence of a pen, east by a division fence, and north by another fence separating the saloon property from the premises occupied by himself and family as a home. The saloon building covered only a part of this ground, but was separated from the remaining lots by fences as above described. The plaintiff has' also used the saloon lot proper in driving his cows and calves from his pens to be watered and in admitting them in same way.
“Green Warren, after the completion of the building, engaged in the retail liquor business, but failing to succeed, retired from that business five years ago, intending, however, again to engage in that business as soon as he might be able to do so. Since his retirement from the retail liquor business Green Warren has constantly rented out the saloon building with the ground on which it stands, about 35x40 feet, to various tenants, at an average rental of $10 per month, and said property was so rented out when this suit was brought, and *333 yet continues so to rent the same, but using that part of said lot not actually covered by said building as a passway for his stock.
“On December 29, 1898, Green Warren and S. E. Warren, his wife, made a lease to J. W. Kothman & Co. of certain land off his tract of land shown by the following plat: ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Duncan v. Woolf
380 S.W.2d 862 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1964)
Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co. v. Guthrie
100 S.W.2d 125 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)
O'Fiel v. Janes
269 S.W. 1074 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Westchester Fire Ins. Co. v. Biggs
216 S.W. 274 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1919)
McCaslin v. Veasy
199 S.W. 1173 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Buckholts State Bank v. Thallman
196 S.W. 687 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Shannon v. Hay
153 S.W. 360 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1912)
Spiller v. Hollinger
148 S.W. 338 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 S.W. 62, 26 Tex. Civ. App. 331, 1901 Tex. App. LEXIS 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-kohr-texapp-1901.