Warren v. Joyce

547 P.2d 147, 274 Or. 473, 1976 Ore. LEXIS 893
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 18, 1976
StatusPublished

This text of 547 P.2d 147 (Warren v. Joyce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warren v. Joyce, 547 P.2d 147, 274 Or. 473, 1976 Ore. LEXIS 893 (Or. 1976).

Opinion

O’CONNELL, C. J.

This is a suit in the nature of a suit to quiet title to certain real property. Defendants appeal from a decree granting plaintiff’s requested relief.

Plaintiff acquired his interest in the property through a sheriff’s certificate and deed executed to plaintiff upon his purchase of the property at a sale on the foreclosure of a second mortgage, which foreclosed the interests of all persons except Felix Bauer, the holder of a first mortgage on the property. Plaintiff concedes that his interest is subordinate to the interest of Bauer or his successors in interest. Defendants Joyce acquired Bauer’s interest as trustees for Seldon and Alta Mason. The defendants Joyce and Mason contend that they not only acquired Bauer’s interest but that they also cut off the interest plaintiff acquired at the foreclosure sale.

We can find no basis for reaching this result. The validity of the foreclosure sale is not questioned and it is undisputed that defendants had notice of plaintiff’s interest when they acquired Bauer’s interest as first mortgagee. There is no evidence to establish any other ground that would cut off plaintiff’s interest. The decree of the trial court must, therefore, be affirmed insofar as it recognizes the validity of plaintiff’s interest acquired at the foreclosure sale. The decree could be interpreted as cutting off the interest of defendants as assignee of the first mortgagee. The foreclosure of the second mortgage did not, of course, affect the interest of Bauer or his successors in the first mortgage and therefore it remains a lien on the property in question unless it has been discharged or otherwise terminated. The decree should be clarified to exclude from the foreclosure the superior lien of the first mortgage.

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
547 P.2d 147, 274 Or. 473, 1976 Ore. LEXIS 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-joyce-or-1976.