Warren v. Illinois Department of Corrections
This text of Warren v. Illinois Department of Corrections (Warren v. Illinois Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
TRENT WARREN,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 3:20-CV-532-RJD-NJR
FELIX RODRIGUEZ, JANE DOE NURSES 1-5, and JEFFREY DENNISON,
Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ROSENSTENGEL, Chief Judge: Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly (Doc. 62), which recommends that the undersigned dismiss Plaintiff Trent Warren’s claims against Defendant Jane Doe Nurse #1 with prejudice. Judge Daly further recommends the dismissal of Jeffrey Dennison, who is named as a defendant only in his official capacity. Judge Daly entered a Scheduling and Discovery Order directing Warren to identify Jane Doe Nurse #1 by June 4, 2021. (Doc. 55). Judge Daly warned Warren that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of Jane Doe #1. To date, however, Warren has neither identified nor taken steps to identify the unknown defendant. Judge Daly therefore recommends the dismissal of Jane Doe Nurse #1 with prejudice. Judge Daly further recommends that Dennison, the Warden of Lawrence Correctional Center, be dismissed. Dennison was named as a party solely for the purpose of carrying out any injunctive relief and assisting with the identification of the unknown defendants. Because Warren is no longer incarcerated at Lawrence, his claims for injunctive relief are moot. And, if Judge Daly’s Report and Recommendation is adopted, all remaining defendants will have been identified. Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due January 18, 2022. No objections were filed. Where no party objects, this Court need only review a Report and Recommendation for clear error. Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). The Court may then “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS Judge Daly’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 62) and DISMISSES with prejudice Plaintiff Trent Warren’s claims against Jane Doe Nurse #1. Defendant Jeffrey Dennison is also DISMISSED as a party to this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 19, 2022 Tl wolf lowtegl NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL Chief U.S. District Judge
Page 2 of 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Warren v. Illinois Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-illinois-department-of-corrections-ilsd-2022.