Warren v. . High

5 N.C. 436
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJuly 5, 1810
StatusPublished

This text of 5 N.C. 436 (Warren v. . High) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warren v. . High, 5 N.C. 436 (N.C. 1810).

Opinion

Rill, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

it appears that the only real question hqre decided, was as to the real property, under the issue of “ devis-avit vel turn” In the County Court, a verdict was found for the Plaintiff, although there was only one subscribing witness to the will. The Defendant very properly appealed, and a verdict was found in favor of him in the Superior Court. As oiir law requires at least two subscribing witnesses to a will of -land, and as it was supposed by those who had an agency in deciding this question in the County Court, that that requisite might be dispensed with, the Defendant was necessarily driven to his appeal 5 and of .course, the Plaintiff ought to pay the costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 N.C. 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-high-nc-1810.