Warren v. F. C. Daffin Co.

88 So. 319, 81 Fla. 166
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 14, 1921
StatusPublished

This text of 88 So. 319 (Warren v. F. C. Daffin Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warren v. F. C. Daffin Co., 88 So. 319, 81 Fla. 166 (Fla. 1921).

Opinion

Whitfield, J.

In an action begun by attachment there was constructive service by publication. Judgment by default for failure to appear was entered by the clerk on a rule day, and final judgment for the plaintiff was entered the same day by the clerk. .A writ of error was taken.

A final judgment cannot be entered by the clerk of the Circuit Court where the only service of notice of the suit is by publication. Busard v. Houston, 65 Fla. 479, 62 South. Rep. 483; Sec. 1426, Gen. Stats., 1906, Compiled Laws, 1914; Marshall v. Ravisies, 22 Fla. 583; Cornwell v. Williford, 73 Fla. 305, 73 South. Rep. 795.

The final judgment entered by the clerk was unauthorized and illegal.

Judgment reversed.

Browne, C. J., and Taylor, Ellis and West, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marshall v. Ravisies
22 Fla. 583 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1886)
Busard v. Houston ex rel. Houston
62 So. 483 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1913)
Cornwell v. Williford
73 Fla. 305 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1917)
State ex rel. Howie v. Brantley
73 So. 795 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 So. 319, 81 Fla. 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-f-c-daffin-co-fla-1921.