Warren v. Commissioner

1959 T.C. Memo. 15, 18 T.C.M. 75, 1959 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 228
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedJanuary 30, 1959
DocketDocket Nos. 63272, 63281.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1959 T.C. Memo. 15 (Warren v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warren v. Commissioner, 1959 T.C. Memo. 15, 18 T.C.M. 75, 1959 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 228 (tax 1959).

Opinion

Cecil R. Warren v. Commissioner. Cecil R. Warren and Helen M. Warren, (Husband and Wife) v. Commissioner.
Warren v. Commissioner
Docket Nos. 63272, 63281.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1959-15; 1959 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 228; 18 T.C.M. (CCH) 75; T.C.M. (RIA) 59015;
January 30, 1959
James A. Ronayne, Esq., 120 Broadway, New York, N. Y., for the petitioners. James J. Quinn, Esq., and William T. Holloran, Esq., for the respondent.

KERN

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

By a deficiency notice dated April 17, 1956, respondent determined deficiencies in income tax and additions to tax against Cecil R. Warren, petitioner in Docket No. 63272, for the years 1945 and 1946 as follows:

Additions to Tax under
294(d)294
YearDeficiency293(b)(1)(A)(d)(2)
1945$500.54$250.27$46.44$30.97
1946960.43480.2190.0060.00

On the same date*229 respondent determined deficiencies in income tax and additions to tax against Cecil R. Warren and Helen M. Warren, petitioners in Docket No. 63281, for the years 1947, 1948, and 1949 as follows:

Additions to Tax under
294(d)294
YearDeficiency293(b)(1)(A)(d)(2)
1947$ 1,638.60$ 819.30$ 91.38
19481,456.76728.38$104.3989.48
194949,344.8224,672.412,953.09

The deficiencies result from respondent's determination that petitioners' taxable net income for the years in question exceeded the income reported as "computed upon the basis of increase in net worth during the taxable years, with adjustment for personal and other non deductible amounts paid." By affirmative allegations in respondent's answers the issue of fraud is raised.

The parties have stipulated many facts relating to petitioners' net worth. As a result the principal issue is whether petitioners received gifts prior to October 1949 from the mother of petitioner Helen M. Warren and received in the latter part of 1949 assets and funds as an inheritance from her subsequent to her death on October 15 of that year, as petitioners contend, or, as respondent*230 contends, the assets and funds received by petitioners were in reality theirs and were placed by them in the mother's estate as part of a scheme devised by petitioners for the purpose of fraudulently avoiding the ascertainment by respondent of their correct taxable income by use of the so-called net worth method.

Findings of Fact

We find the facts to be as stipulated by the parties and incorporate herein by this reference the stipulation of facts and supplemental stipulation of facts filed herein, together with the exhibits attached to such stipulations.

Cecil R. Warren, one of the petitioners herein, was appointed to the Bureau of Internal Revenue, United States Treasury Department, on July 1, 1935, and remained in such employment until he resigned on October 31, 1950. His salary from 1935 through 1949 was in the following amounts for the years shown:

YearAmount
1935$1,300.00
19362,600.00
19372,600.00
19382,800.00
19392,800.00
19402,900.00
19413,200.00

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Massei
355 U.S. 595 (Supreme Court, 1958)
Cohen v. Commissioner
27 T.C. 221 (U.S. Tax Court, 1956)
L. Schepp Co. v. Commissioner
25 B.T.A. 419 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1959 T.C. Memo. 15, 18 T.C.M. 75, 1959 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-commissioner-tax-1959.