Warren v. Commissioner

11 T.C.M. 986, 1952 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 74
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Warren v. Commissioner. Read the opinion of the Court — 20 T.C. 378
United States Tax Court·Decided October 2, 1952·No. Docket No. 25193.·Unpublished

Opinion

Frances I. Warren v. Commissioner.
Warren v. Commissioner
Docket No. 25193.
United States Tax Court
1952 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 74; 11 T.C.M. (CCH) 986; T.C.M. (RIA) 52291;
October 2, 1952
Harold E. Smith, Esq., and Ralph R. Quillian, Esq., for the petitioner. Newman A. Townsend, Jr., Esq., for the respondent.

RAUM

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

This proceeding involves the following deficiencies in income tax and additions to tax determined by the respondent against the petitioner:

50% addition6% addition10% addition
YearDeficiencyto taxto taxto tax
1944$28,115.12$14,057.56$ 40.56
19454,654.312,327.16279.26
19469,307.124,653.56585.60$976.01
19471,300.44650.22112.92194.09

The issues are:

(1) Did the respondent err in including unidentified bank deposits in the petitioner's taxable net income for the years 1944, 1945, 1946 and 1947?

(2) Is*75 the petitioner liable for the 50 per cent addition to tax for fraud provided for in Section 293(b) of the Internal Revenue Code?

(3) Is the petitioner liable for the 6 per cent addition to tax prescribed by Section 294(d)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code for substantial underestimate of tax?

(4) Is the petitioner liable for the 10 per cent addition to tax provided for by Section 294(d)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code for failure to file a declaration of estimated tax for the taxable years 1946 and 1947?

(5) Is the assessment and collection of the deficiency for the year 1945 barred by the provisions of Section 275(a) of the Internal Revenue Code?

Other issues raised by the pleadings with respect to minor adjustments made by the respondent for the year 1946 were waived by the petitioner at the trial.

Findings of Fact

The parties have filed a stipulation as to some of the facts involved herein; that stipulation is hereby adopted as part of our findings, and is incorporated herein by reference.

Petitioner is a resident of Atlanta, Georgia. She filed her income tax returns for*76 the taxable years with the collector of internal revenue for the district of Georgia.

Petitioner and Robert L. Warren were married in September 1923. They had three children. They were separted on or about January 22, 1946, and divorced on or about June 6, 1946. Robert L. Warren died on March 18, 1949.

The Warren Produce Company commenced business in 1929. During its existence it had at various times from one to five leased stores in Atlanta which sold poultry and produce. Robert L. Warren operated this business for approximately one year. In the early part of 1930 he became bankrupt and the petitioner purchased the fixtures of the business from a bank which was one of the creditors. Petitioner operated the business from 1930 until it was discontinued in June or July, 1942, during which time her husband had nothing to do with the operation of the stores, except that he worked for petitioner as the buyer for the main store which was located at 195 Edgewood Avenue in Atlanta. Petitioner kept the books of the business, which had approximately thirty employees, and during each of the years 1941 and 1942, its total receipts amounted to approximately $100,000. In a joint return filed*77 by petitioner and her husband for 1942, a net loss of $3,837.42 from the operation of the business was reported.

Petitioner ceased to operate the poultry and produce business in June, 1942. Thereafter until June 1945, when she lost the leases to the stores, she subleased to her former store managers the buildings and equipment on a profit-sharing basis, each sublessee paying her an amount equal to the rent she paid the owners of the real estate plus a percentage of the profits.

In 1942, when the poultry and produce business was discontinued, Robert L. Warren entered the used-car business under the name of R. L. Warren Motor Company. He used the money in the bank account of the Warren Produce Company in the East Atlanta Bank to get started. During 1942, the operations of the used-car business were entered in the same set of books that had theretofore been used for the poultry and produce business. The bank account of the Warren Produce Company was closed out about January 1, 1943, and accounts were opened at the East Atlanta Bank in the name of the R. L. Warren Motor Company and in the name of the petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warren v. Commissioner, 11 T.C.M. 986, 1952 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 74 (tax 1952).

11 T.C.M. 986 (Warren v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gano v. Commissioner
19 B.T.A. 518 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1930)